Saturday, November 24, 2012

Lessons Learned Information System. 11-15 - 11/22 2012


LLIS.gov Logo

Below you'll find a list of new documents posted on LLIS.gov between 11/15/2012 and 11/22/2012 in your particular areas of interest. We continually add information that is relevant and interesting to you, so please login often to LLIS.gov and explore, share, and connect.

EMERGENCY DISCIPLINES:

Community Preparedness
Emergency Management
Military
Public Health

FEATURED TOPICS:

Lessons Learned Information Sharing
Help@llis.dhs.gov  
866-476-4827

Deepwater Horizon: BP’s Civil Fines Could be 10 Times Larger than Record Criminal Penalty




BP’s Civil Fines Could be 10 Times Larger than Record Criminal Penalty

The $4.5 billion oil giant BP has agreed to pay out for criminal misconduct related to the Deepwater Horizon spill is too small to change the company’s business model. Yet more and bigger payments are likely to come.
Document Actions
by
oil cleaners by SH-555.jpg
BP workers attempt to clean a beach in Pensacola Beach, Fla., in June 2010. 
The BP Deepwater Horizon settlement of $4.5 billion announced Thursday may be the highest criminal fine in U.S. history, but some citizen advocates and environmentalists still say it’s not enough. The 2010 oil spill along the Gulf Coast was the largest single environmental and industrial disaster in the United States and the responsible party is a corporation with one of the worst safety and environmental records on the books.
Compared with its massive profits ($25.7 billion in 2011, according to the BP’s website), the fine is not likely to result in any change in business as usual for the company.

The fine can be paid out over five years and is well within the company’s abilities to manage financially.
“This settlement contains nothing that addresses the institutional problems of BP and its callous treatment of its employees and the environment,” said Tyler Slocum, Director of the Energy Program at consumer advocacy group Public Citizen. The fine can be paid out over five years and is well within the company’s abilities to manage financially.

Slocum says federal sanctions against BP would more effectively deter the kind of negligence that resulted in the Deepwater spill. Sanctions could include preventing BP from earning money via federal contract and forbidding them from leasing federal land. Though it is now a admitted felon, the company remains the largest fuel contractor for the Department of Defense and will earn more through those contracts in the next year than it will pay out in the current settlement.

Jacqueline Savitz, deputy vice president of international ocean advocacy group Oceana, pointed to a lack of progress in legislative protections against the dangers of offshore drilling. “Nothing in this settlement, and no law passed since the spill, prevents the next major offshore spill from happening,” she said in a press release dated November 15.

While many say more remains to be done to hold BP accountable, environmentalists seemed to agree that the company’s financial resources will play an important role in the recovery. The good news here is that BP has yet to face civil claims for its violations of environmental legislation such as the Clean Water Act and the Oil Pollution Act. These civil claims could be more than ten times higher than the criminal fines the company has just agreed to pay. Public Citizen calculates that civil claims against BP could total $51.5 billion, while Oceana put the figure as high as $90 billion.

Attorney General Eric HOlder announced last Thursday that his office is prepared to go to trial in February on the Clean Water Act violations, which various estimates put at between $10 and $21 billion. It is unclear at this time if further violations will be prosecuted.

 Ialeggio says that whenever there is any kind of storm or disturbance in the weather, tar balls wash up on the beach.

The civil trials will make public much of the yet-to-be released data on the extent of the spill’s environmental impact. According to James Ialeggio, a field biologist who helped to conduct post-spill damage assessment, reports of the devastation have been intentionally understated. “My overwhelming impression of the cleanup effort I saw was that it was driven by two things: BP’s desire to minimize its own culpability, and the Gulf region’s effort to minimize the impact on their tourism,” he said.

Ialeggio was with the first out-of-state nonprofit teams to be given access to the area, some two months after the spill. By that time, much of the oil had been hidden by controversial chemical dispersants used for the first time in the Deepwater Horizon spill. The dispersants minimized the appearance of oil slicks by separating them into miniscule particles. Some researchers found that the combination of oil and dispersants had toxic effects.

Meanwhile, oil continues to be discovered. This summer, the Times Picayune reported that a 30-by-30 foot mat of solidified oil had washed up on Louisiana's Grand Isle Beach, not long after BP had declared the area clean. Ialeggio says that whenever there is any kind of storm or disturbance in the weather, tar balls wash up on the beach, though he can’t be sure they are connected to the Deepwater Horizon incident.

BP has indicated it is prepared to fight upcoming civil charges on two major points: They will contest the government’s figures on the gallons of oil spilled, and they will argue for charges of negligence rather than gross negligence, which carries higher penalties. The outcome of the upcoming trial will indicate more about whether financial punishment is adequate in this case.

“The government says that the biggest fine in history equates with justice being served,” said Allison Fisher, Outreach Director of the Energy Program at Public Citizen. “To maintain that narrative, they will really have to come through with the civil charges.”

Signe Predmore wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. Signe is an editorial intern at YES! and is currently on leave from studying international politics in Sweden.

http://www.yesmagazine.org/planet/BP-civil-fines-could-be-ten-times-larger-than-record-criminal-penalty?utm_source=wkly20121123&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=titlePredmore

Friday, November 23, 2012

IPS: Human Right to Water and Sanitation




Human Right to Water and Sanitation Remains a Political Mirage

Indigenous women hauling water in Chiapas, Mexico. Credit: Mauricio Ramos/IPS
Indigenous women hauling water in Chiapas, Mexico. Credit: Mauricio Ramos/IPS

UNITED NATIONS, Aug 1 2012 (IPS) - When the 193-member General Assembly, the U.N.’s highest policy-making body, declared water and sanitation a basic human right back in July 2010, the adoption of that divisive resolution was hailed by many as a “historic” achievement.

But as the international community commemorated the second anniversary of that resolution last week, there was hardly any political rejoicing either inside or outside the United Nations.

“This human right is yet to be fully implemented,” complained a coalition of 15 international non-governmental organisations (NGOs), whose members describe themselves as “water justice activists”.



Demanding concrete action by individual governments, the coalition said, “As members of the global water justice movement, we are deeply concerned to see little progress being made towards the full implementation of this right.”

In a letter sent to member states, the 15 organisations said that as “governments aggressively pursue false solutions to the environmental and economic crises, the situation will only deepen the water injustices that our organisations and communities have been fighting for decades.”

The coalition includes the Council of Canadians, the Blue Planet Project, Food and Water Watch, National Alliance of People’s Movement of India, People’s Coalition for the Right to Water in Indonesia and Food and Water Europe.

The organisations, in collaboration with the Blue Planet Project, have produced a series of reports examining key obstacles to the implementation of the human right to water in several countries, including Argentina, Ecuador, Canada, Colombia, Indonesia, India, Palestine, the United States and countries in Europe.

In March, the U.N. children’s agency UNICEF and the World Health Organisation (WHO) released a joint report claiming that the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) target of halving the proportion of people without access to safe drinking water (spelled out under Goal 7 on environmental sustainability) has been reached well in advance of the 2015 deadline.

“Today, we recognise a great achievement for people of the world,” Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said, with a tinge of pride, pointing out that “this is one of the first MDG targets to be met.”

At the end of 2010, 89 percent of the world’s population, or 6.1 billion people, used improved drinking water sources, such as piped supplies and protected wells, according to the study titled “Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2012.”

This is one percent more than the 88 percent MDG target. And by 2015, about 92 percent of the global population will have access to improved drinking water, says the report released by the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation.

A cautious UNICEF Executive Director Anthony Lake warned that victory could not yet be declared since at least 11 percent of the world’s population – roughly around 783 million people – are still without access to safe drinking water, and billions without sanitation facilities.

Tom Slaymaker, senior policy analyst at the London-based WaterAid, told IPS it is too early to say that the resolution on the human right to water has failed in its implementation.

“But two years on we have not yet seen the sort of step change in effort needed to reverse the historical neglect of water and, more particularly, sanitation in international development cooperation,” he added.
Slaymaker said the second “High Level Meeting of Sanitation and Water for All Partnership”, in April 2012, offered encouraging signs of increased political attention to the problem.

“But the resulting government commitments to get countries off-track to achieve the sanitation MDG back on track to meet the target in 2015 need to be backed up with the required financial resources to make progressive realisation of the human right to water and sanitation a reality,” he said.

A further key test, he pointed out, will be the extent to which emerging goals for development in the post MDG era take account of obligations relating to the human right to water and sanitation and set ambitious new targets for achieving universal access.

The resolution in the General Assembly proved politically divisive, with 122 countries voting for it and 41 abstaining, but with no negative votes.

The United States abstained and so did some of the European and industrialised countries, including Britain, Australia, Austria, Canada, Greece, Sweden, Japan, Israel, South Korea, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Ireland.

But several developing nations, mostly from Africa, also abstained on the vote, siding with rich industrial countries.

These included Botswana, Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Zambia, Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago.
In its letter, the NGO coalition said the recently concluded Rio+20 summit on sustainable development affirmed “full and unquestioned consensus among UN Member States regarding the human right to water and sanitation”.

“We are therefore demanding the full implementation of this vital human right, and remedies to the tremendous obstacles we are facing in all of our regions,” the letter added.

The letter refers to several regional chapters in a new report titled “Our Right to Water: A People’s Guide to Implementing the United Nations’ Recognition of Water and Sanitation as a Human Right” authored by Maude Barlow, chairperson of the Council of Canadians and former senior advisor on water to the 63rd president of the United Nations General Assembly.

These reports, the letters says, provide several regionally-specific recommendations to ensure the progressive realization of the human right to water and sanitation.



http://www.ipsnews.net/2012/08/human-right-to-water-and-sanitation-remains-a-political-mirage/


IPS News Agency: Fixing the 'Silent' Sanitation Crisis





Fixing the ‘Silent’ Sanitation Crisis


Nearly 2.5 billion people around the world don’t have access to sanitation. Credit: Charles Mpaka/IPS
Nearly 2.5 billion people around the world don’t have access to sanitation. Credit: Charles Mpaka/IPS

GENEVA, Nov 18 2012 (IPS) - Organisers of this year’s World Toilet Day, which falls on Nov. 19, are using the slogan ‘I give a shit – do you?’ to break the silence around the crucial issue of sanitation and remind the international community that 2.5 billion people around the world don’t have access to clean and private toilets.

Improving these figures, and achieving the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) of halving the number of people without basic sanitation by 2015, needs a change of mindset and strong political will, not financial resources, campaigners say.

“(One and a half) billion people, or 15 percent of the world’s population, are still defecating in the open. Of the MDG targets for 2015, sanitation is the furthest off track… (At) the current rate it will only be reached in 2026,” Saskia Castelein, advocacy and communications officer at the Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council (WSSCC) told IPS.

This Geneva-based organisation, created by a United Nations resolution, was responsible for making sanitation an MDG target at the 2002 Johannesburg Summit on Sustainable Development.

“In the last ten years, sanitation has made a lot of progress in terms of awareness and community approaches,” Castelein continued. An increasing number of “people and organisations are working around the issue and (are using) the MDG framework to lobby governments. Now there is more money, but challenges are still enormous.”

Jack Sim, founder of the World Toilet Organisation and initiator of World Toilet Day, is of the opinion that “What we don’t discuss, we can’t improve.”

Sim has been instrumental in putting the issue of sanitation on the international agenda.

“Over the last 12 years, World Toilet Day has become an amazing movement for everyone to support better toilets and sanitation conditions around the world. It has also become a day of creativity as people all over the globe celebrate it in their own style,” he added.

Much progress has been made in India, China and other parts of East Asia, with China being the most likely to meet the goal on time.

But most of Asia and sub-Saharan Africa are still riddled with problems, with only three countries – Botswana, Cape Verde and Angola – on track.


She argues that policymakers are reluctant to bring such an “unglamorous topic” into the limelight and governments are hesitant to interfere in this most private aspect of people’s lives.

Meanwhile cultural customs and habits are compounding the problem.

“In some places, it is a social tradition to defecate in the open,” a practice that often leads to the spread of diseases like cholera and typhoid, she said.

Diarrhoeal diseases, a direct consequence of poor sanitation, are the second most common cause of death among young children in developing countries, killing more than HIV/AIDS, malaria and measles combined, and resulting in one death every 20 seconds.

Thus, experts argue, improving sanitation in the developing would also expedite the fourth MDG – improving child health and reducing under-five mortality by two-thirds in the next three years.

Reluctance to embrace modern sanitation can be solved by “a community-driven approach,” Castelein said, with development practitioners going from village to village and “training the trainers” on the importance of proper sanitation.

According to Castelein, there is no need to invest millions of dollars into building water-flush toilets all over the world – all that is needed is a global effort to promote basic hygiene by educating people about simple steps like washing their hands with ash, which is a good disinfectant.

Many people, particularly in the developing world, are unaware that sanitation was proclaimed a basic human right by the U.N. general assembly in 2010. Increased awareness of this right could push people to pressure their governments to provide proper facilities.

Campaigners also point out that proper sanitation facilities are crucial for women and girls during menstruation; according to a study by Plan India, 23 percent of Indian girls drop out of school when they reach puberty. World Toilet Day demands safe and appropriate toilet facilities to keep them in school, thus overlapping with the MDG of eliminating gender disparities in primary and secondary education.

(END)

Thursday, November 22, 2012

“Earthquake” in Memphis

“Earthquake” in Memphis

The Medical Education & Research Institute (MERI) have developed a training program to ensure an effective interface between civilians and the military in case of a disaster.


At the University of Memphis (UM), Wright State University National Center for Medical Readiness (NCMR), and the Medical Education and Research Institute (MERI), they knew the odds of experiencing a hurricane is much less than “experiencing” an earthquake. It was with this thought in mind that they eveloped a training program to ensure an effective interface between civilian and military operations in the event of a catastrophe requiring aeromedical evacuation.

Many lessons were learnt from hurricane Katrina, including the need for a military agenda for crisis management and the need to implement multiple exercises to strengthen civil-military cooperation and communication. The surprising nature of natural disasters and their catastrophic effects call for massive coordinated responses on short notice.

The military has the manpower, equipment, training, and organization necessary to amass relief efforts required during catastrophic incident recovery.

Funded by a grant from the U.S. Department of Defense, the simulated earthquake scenario took place at the MERI with the sound of crashing furniture and falling ceilings, furniture was tossed about while the loss of electricity only served to amplify the sounds of “people” trapped under debris in the dimly lit building. Emergency sirens blared and suddenly there was the loud hum of military transport aircraft. Time was of the essence, and Memphis’ first responders and medical personnel prepared to maneuver themselves through the post-earthquake rubble.

All the simulators were used as the “walking wounded” in this “earthquake” exercise. Gaumard’s birthing simulator NOELLE® was in the throes of labor and hemorrhaging. Someone in this condition is not a candidate for military air evacuation because she isn’t stable. “Whenever you’re doing aeromedical evacuation, or leaving by air, you have to take into consideration the altitude changes. When you
have altitude changes, a small air leak in the thoracic cavity can become significant and cause increased pressure on the heart leading to cardiac arrest” noted Ms. Brown, Simulation Education Coordinator.

Such was the chaotic scene which signaled the start of the training for a mass-casualty drill. Continuing through to April, this course, Civilian Aeromedical Evacuation Sustainment Training (CAEST) brings together both


military and civilians interfacing in a very stressful situation, and under less than ideal conditions. It also encompasses the use of both air evacuation and transport.

“We were not only looking at how to deal with a disaster within our community, but how to work with colleagues, and communicating effectively with our military counterparts,” said Shirley Brown, MERI, Simulation Education Coordinator.

The MERI has been around since the 1990’s, starting as a non-for-profit bio skills cadaver lab where physicians could come and practice skills on un-embalmed cadavers. Their body donation program, Genesis, has evolved over the years to include a wider audience which now incorporates human patient simulation as part of the teaching methodology. First responders, physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists and EMS students have all come to the MERI, along with attendees from over 28 different countries.


MERI conducts concurrent sessions, one group in the anatomical lab doing high risk, low volume skill sets, such as needle compressions and another group working with the simulators where they will have to employ all those skills. “I think the biggest thing we’ve learned is that having cadavers and simulators under one roof has opened up a lot of unique training opportunities, because it really takes both modalities to cover all the bases,” says Brenda Belk.

MERI does not have a mobile RV, but they have taken 22 foot refrigerated trucks, loaded with anatomical donors, simulators and lab equipment all over the United States and Canada, recreating the lab environment in conference spaces, ballrooms, convention centers – wherever they are asked. This facilitates physicians who are unable to travel to Memphis.

“ I like that we can use your simulators with a patient monitor, the hospital can use their equipment, their supplies and things in their own environment and people really get to learn what to do in emergency situations, and they are familiar with where they need to go and who’s involved.”

One of the many things that the Civilian Aeromedical Evacuation Sustainment training (CAEST) prepares civilian nursing and allied health, public health, and emergency responders to do is appropriately assess and prepare patients in pre-hospital, harsh environments, and clinical collection sites for aeromedical evacuation.

Not all medical equipment is transportable. Careful attention to the types of equipment approved for air transport, along with ‘packaging’ the patient differently to compensate for fluid changes and swelling are also addressed in this exercise. This fact was brought out after hurricane Katrina, when some patients were unable to be transported, and there were those who felt that the military was simply not accepting patients. CAEST also serves to compliment already existing military training. There are significant differences between military and civilian systems, such as communications, medical triage, patient evacuation and transfer protocols which are all addressed in this course.

In 2011, five year old HAL® S3005 and Susie® S2000 participated in a real-life terrorist exercise where participants were trained to improve clinical outcomes and enhance patient safety. “We’ve had pediatric fellows use the baby and the five year old in high risk, low volume incidences,” said Shirley Brown, “such as seizures or cardiac arrhythmia, or conduct scenarios focusing on team dynamics and communication.”

Communication between civilians and the military is very different, but through these kinds of exercises, it has been found that if they both adhere to medical terminology, everybody is able to understand and ommunicate in a respectful, clear and concise manner. It is all about working as a team.

To learn more about the MERI please visit www.meri.org.

RECOMMENDED READING LIST

Search This Blog

ARCHIVE List 2011 - Present