Tuesday, September 18, 2018

Disaster Declaration Process: DHS\FEMA. Presidential Declarations September 2018

https://www.fema.gov/disaster-declaration-process

The Disaster Declaration Process

This page provides procedural information regarding the Stafford Act declaration process and is intended for emergency managers, elected officials, media, and stakeholders interested in the formal declaration process.  All emergency and major disaster declarations are made solely at the discretion of the President of the United States.

Policy and Guidance

  •          Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act
  •          Sandy Recovery Improvement Act

The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121-5207 (the Stafford Act) §401 states in part that: "All requests for a declaration by the President that a major disaster exists shall be made by the Governor of the affected State."  A State also includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.  The Republic of Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia are also eligible to request a declaration and receive assistance through the Compacts of Free Association.
As a result of the Sandy Recovery Improvement Act, federally recognized Indian tribal governments now have the option of pursuing a declaration directly from the President. FEMA has developed Tribal Declarations Pilot Guidance, which provides more detailed and specific guidance for Tribal requests.
FEMA has codified the declaration process at 44 C.F.R. Part §206, Subpart B.

This section is Expanded. Click to CollapseThe Preliminary Damage Assessment

If it is apparent that a Presidential disaster declaration may be necessary to assist in the recovery of the impacted area, the State or Indian tribal government should contact their FEMA Regional Office and request a joint Federal, State/Tribal Preliminary Damage Assessment (PDA).  Local government representatives should be included, if possible.  Together, the team will conduct a thorough assessment of the impacted area to determine the extent of the disaster, its impact on individuals and public facilities, and the types of federal assistance that may be needed.  This information is included in the Governor or Tribal Chief Executive’s request to show that the disaster is of such severity and magnitude that effective response is beyond the capabilities of the State and the affected local governments or Indian tribal government and that supplemental federal assistance is necessary.

This section is Expanded. Click to CollapseState Or Indian Tribal Goverment Resources Overwhelmed

Once the PDA is complete and the State or Indian tribal government determines that the damage exceeds their resources, the Governor or Tribal Chief Executive may submit a declaration request to the President through their FEMA Regional Office.  As part of the request, the Governor or Tribal Chief Executive must take appropriate action under State or Tribal law and direct the execution of the State or Tribal emergency plan.  The Governor or Tribal Chief Executive shall furnish information on the nature and amount of State and local or Indian tribal government resources that have been or will be committed to alleviating the results of the disaster, provide an estimate of the amount and severity of damage and the impact on the private and public sectors, and provide an estimate of the type and amount of assistance needed under the Stafford Act.  In addition, the Governor or Tribal Chief Executive must certify that, for the current disaster, State and local governments or Indian tribal governmenr obligations and expenditures will comply with all applicable cost-sharing requirements.
Generally, the PDA is completed prior to the submission of the Governor or Tribal Chief Executive’s request for a major disaster declaration.  However, when an obviously severe or catastrophic event occurs, the Governor or Tribal Chief Executive’s request may be submitted prior to completion of the PDA.1  In such circumstances the major disaster will generally be limited to Public Assistance Categories A and/or B (which may be further limited to Direct Federal Assistance (DFA)) and Hazard Mitigation Assistance.  For high-impact events where the level of damage to residences is empirically overwhelming, the declaration may also include Individual Assistance.  Additional forms of assistance may be added at a later date, pending the completion of PDAs.
144 C.F.R. §206.36

This section is Expanded. Click to CollapseDeclaration Types

There are two types of disaster declarations provided for in the Stafford Act: emergency declarations and major disaster declarations.2  
Both declaration types authorize the President to provide supplemental federal disaster assistance.  However, the events related to the two different types of declaration and scope and amount of assistance differ.
Emergency Declarations:  The President can declare an emergency for any occasion or instance when the President determines federal assistance is needed.  Emergency declarations supplement State and local or Indian tribal government efforts in providing emergency services, such as the protection of lives, property, public health, and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in any part of the United States.  The total amount of assistance provided for in a single emergency may not exceed $5 million. The President shall report to Congress if this amount is exceeded.
Requirements3:  The Governor of the affected State or Tribal Chief Executive of the affected Tribe must submit a request to the President, through the appropriate Regional Administrator, within 30 days of the occurrence of the incident.  The request must be based upon a finding that the situation is beyond the capability of the State and affected local governments or Indian tribal government and that supplemental federal emergency assistance is necessary to save lives and protect property, public health and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a disaster.  In addition, the request must include:
  • Confirmation that the Governor or Tribal Chief Executive has taken appropriate action under State or Tribal law and directed the execution of the State or Tribal emergency plan;
  • A description of the State and local or Indian tribal government efforts and resources utilized to alleviate the emergency;
  • A description of other federal agency efforts and resources utilized in response to the emergency; and
  • A description of the type and extent of additional federal assistance required.
Assistance Available Under Emergency Declarations:
  • Public Assistance (PA) – Only Categories A (debris removal) and B (emergency protective measures) may be authorized under an emergency declaration.Categories C-G (permanent work) are not available under an emergency declaration.  Emergency declarations often include only Category B and will typically be limited to DFA, absent damage assessments showing significant need for financial assistance.  This assistance is generally provided on a 75% federal, 25% non-federal cost sharing basis.
  • Individual Assistance (IA) – The Individuals and Households Program (IHP) is the only form of IA that may be authorized under an emergency declaration.Authorization of IHP under an emergency is rare.  Housing Assistance under IHP is provided at a 100% federal share, while Other Needs Assistance under IHP requires a 25% non-federal cost share.
  • The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) - is not available for emergency declarations.
Pre-Disaster Emergency Declarations4:  A Governor or Tribal Chief Executive may request an emergency declaration in advance or anticipation of the imminent impact of an incident that threatens such destruction as could result in a major disaster.  Such requests must meet all of the statutory and regulatory requirements for an emergency declaration request.  Requests must demonstrate  the existence of critical emergency protective measure needs prior to impact are beyond the capability of the State and affected local governments or Indian tribal government and identify specific unmet emergency needs that can be met through DFA.  Such DFA may include, but is not limited to, personnel, equipment, supplies, and evacuation assistance.  Pre-positioning of assets generally does not require a declaration.  Assistance made available under a pre-disaster emergency declaration will typically be Category B (emergency protective measures), limited to DFA.  FEMA may require damage assessments and/or verified cost estimates if additional types of assistance are requested.
Emergency Declarations with Federal Primary Responsibility:  When an emergency exists for which the primary responsibility rests with the Federal government, the President may declare an emergency without a request from the Governor of the affected State or the Tribal Chief Executive of the affected Tribe.  Such an emergency declaration does not prevent the Governor or Tribal Chief Executive from subsequently requesting a major disaster declaration for other unmet needs caused by the event.
Major Disaster Declarations:  The President can declare a major disaster for any natural event, including any hurricane, tornado, storm, high water, wind-driven water, tidal wave, tsunami, earthquake, volcanic eruption, landslide, mudslide, snowstorm, or drought, or, regardless of cause, fire, flood, or explosion, that the President determines has caused damage of such severity that it is beyond the combined capabilities of state and local governments to respond.  A major disaster declaration provides a wide range of federal assistance programs for individuals and public infrastructure, including funds for both emergency and permanent work.
Requirements5:  The Governor of the affected State or Tribal Chief Executive of the affected Tribe must submit the request to the President through the appropriate Regional Administrator within 30 days of the occurrence of the incident.  The request must based upon a finding that the situation is beyond the capability of the State and affected local governments or Indian tribal government and that supplemental federal assistance is necessary.  In addition the request must include:
  • Confirmation that the Governor or Tribal Chief Executive has taken appropriate action under State or Tribal law and directed execution of the State or Tribal emergency plan;
  • An estimate of the amount and severity of damage to the public and private sector;
  • A description of the State and local or Indian tribal government efforts and resources utilized to alleviate the disaster;
  • Preliminary estimates of the type and amount of Stafford Act assistance needed; and
  • Certification by the Governor or Tribal Chief Executive that the State and local governments or Indian tribal government will comply with all applicable cost sharing requirements.
Assistance Available Under Major Disaster Declarations:  Not all programs, however, are activated for every disaster.  The determination of which programs are authorized is based on the types of assistance specified in the Governor or Tribal Chief Executive’s request and the needs identified during the joint PDA and subsequent PDAs.  FEMA disaster assistance programs are as follows:
  • Individual Assistance - Assistance to individuals and households, which may include:
    • Individuals and Households Program;
    • Crisis Counseling Program
    • Disaster Case Management
    • Disaster Unemployment Assistance
    • Disaster Legal Services
    • Disaster Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
  • Public Assistance - Assistance to State, Tribal, and local governments and certain private nonprofit organizations for emergency work and the repair or replacement of disaster-damaged facilities, which may include the following Categories:
    • A - Debris removal
    • B - Emergency protective measures
    • C – Roads and bridges
    • D – Water control facilities
    • E – Buildings and equipment
    • F – Utilities
    • G – Parks, recreational and other facilities
  • Hazard Mitigation Assistance – Assistance to State, Tribal, and local governments and certain private nonprofit organizations for actions taken to prevent or reduce long term risk to life and property from natural hazards.
Factors: When evaluating requests for major disasters and making recommendations to the President, FEMA considers the following factors6:
(a)  Public Assistance Program
1) Estimated cost of the assistance – FEMA evaluates the estimated cost of Federal and non-Federal public assistance against the population to give some measure of the per capita impact. FEMA uses a per capita amount as an indicator that the disaster is of such severity and magnitude that it might warrant Federal assistance, and adjusts this figure annually, based on the Consumer Price Index.
2) Localized impacts - FEMA evaluates the impact of the disaster at the county and local government levels, as well as at the American Indian and Alaskan Native Tribal Government levels, because, at times, there are extraordinary concentrations of damages that might warrant Federal assistance even if the statewide per capita is not met. This is particularly true where critical facilities (such as major roadways, bridges, public buildings, etc.) are affected or where localized per capita impacts are extremely high. For example, localized damages may be in the tens or even hundreds of dollars per capita, even though the overall per capita impact is low.
3) Insurance coverage in force – FEMA considers the amount of insurance coverage that is in force or should have been in force as required by law and regulation at the time of the disaster, and reduces the amount of anticipated assistance by that amount.
4) Hazard Mitigation – To recognize and encourage mitigation, FEMA considers the extent to which mitigation measures contributed to the reduction of disaster damages. This could be especially significant in those disasters where, because of mitigation, the estimated public assistance damages fell below the per capita indicator.
5) Recent multiple disasters – FEMA also considers the disaster history within the last twelve-month period to better evaluate the overall impact. FEMA considers declarations under the Stafford Act as well as declarations by the Governor or Chief Tribal Executive and to the extent they have expended their own funds.
6) Other federal agency assistance programs – FEMA also considers programs of other Federal agencies because at times their assistance programs more appropriately meet the needs created by the disaster.
(b) Individual Assistance Program
1) Concentration of damage – High concentrations of damages to individuals, such as destroyed or damaged housing, may indicate a greater need for Federal assistance than widespread and scattered damages.
2) Trauma – The degree of trauma to the community is considered, with special attention to large numbers of injuries and deaths, large scale disruptions to normal community functions and services, and emergency needs, such as extended or widespread losses of power or water.
3) Special populations – FEMA considers the impact of the disaster on special populations, such as the low-income, the elderly, and the unemployed.
4) Voluntary agency assistance – The capabilities of voluntary, faith, and community-based organizations are taken into consideration, as these entities play an important role in meeting both the emergency and recovery needs of individuals impacted by disasters.
5) Insurance – Stafford Act assistance is supplemental in nature, and therefore the level of insurance coverage is taken into account; primarily to qualify the scope of necessary assistance.
6) Damaged residences – severity and number. – severity and number – When conducting joint Preliminary Damage Assessments, FEMA evaluates the total number of homes destroyed and damaged, as well as evaluates the accessibility and habitability of the dwellings and the community.

2FEMA has established a third type of declaration, Fire Management Assistance Grant (FMAG) declarations, through regulation.  That process differs significantly from the emergency and major disaster processes.  Read more information regarding the Fire Management Assistance Grant program.
344 C.F.R. §206.35
4This section provides guidance regarding the circumstances under which pre-disaster emergency declarations may be considered and the types of assistance which may be made available, as required by Stafford Act Section 502(c) (42 U.S.C. § 5192(c)).
544 C.F.R. §206.35
644 C.F.R. §206.48. The regulation includes a chart titled “Average Amount of Assistance per Disaster.”  This chart is out of date and is no longer relevant to the declarations process.

This section is Expanded. Click to CollapseAppeals

The Governor or Tribal Chief Executive can appeal the denial of a major disaster or emergency declaration request.  The appeal must be submitted within 30 days of the date of the denial letter and should include additional information justifying the need for supplemental federal assistance.

This section is Expanded. Click to CollapsePost Declaration Actions

Add-ons:  The Governor, the Governor’s Authorized Representative (GAR), or Tribal Chief Executive can request designation of additional counties and programs within 30 days of the declaration or the end of the incident period, whichever is later.  The Governor, GAR, or Tribal Chief Executive may submit an extension request within the 30-day period, providing a valid reason supporting an extension.
Cost Share Adjustments:  The authority to adjust the Public Assistance cost share resides with the President.  FEMA will recommend an increase in the federal share to not more than 90% for Public Assistance when a disaster is so extraordinary that actual federal obligations under the Stafford Act, excluding administrative cost, meet or exceed a qualifying threshold.7
Appeals:  Post declaration determinations are generally subject to a one-time appeal.  Such appeals must be submitted within 30 days of the denial letter.  This deadline may be extended by FEMA, upon request of the State or Indian tribal government.  Extension requests must be submitted within the 30 day deadline.
744 C.F.R. §206.47(b).  The amount is adjusted annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers.

Monday, September 17, 2018

Support for Real-World Experience. Alarm grows inside FEMA as administrator Brock Long fights for his job


I have the deepest respect, and admiration for academia and theorist.  Hands-on practitioners put theory to practice in real-world environment.  

FEMA Administrator 'MUST' be a hands-on practitioner from the field combined with academia.

Regrettably, Real world hands-on experience out weighs theory.  Real world is an ever changing environment that takes into account all systems internal and external environmental components on demand in life saving situations.

IG focus on insurance, mitigation, preparedness, continuity, and grant programs under Daniel Kaniewski should be focus. Leadership guides these groups.
This statement alone is questionable regarding relationship of DHS Secretary Kristen Nielsen and Daniel Kaniewski
'...She and Kaniewski are close friends and onetime housemates, according to three current and former colleagues.....'
Emergency Management is a non-political entity which follows the tenants of all responders primary imperative..."To Save Lives".  
As a veteran, and emergency manager a true leader leads by example, and knowing hands-on in the field obstacles that staff and personnel encounter.  The 'book' or policy is there to guide us in an ideal situation.  In real-world situations experience and knowledge comes into play.
If non-political I shall support FEMA Administrator Brock Long on those qualities alone.
Sincerely,

Charles D. Sharp
CEO.  Black Emergency Managers Association International
Washington, D.C.

About this website
WASHINGTONPOST.COM




The agency is without a deputy director and the third in command has little hands-on disaster management experience, Long’s allies say.

Saturday, September 15, 2018

Emergency Management Monitoring - Continuous Process. Virginia (VDEM) 2018 Audit Report


As part of our continuous effort to monitor services to communities for inclusion & diversity and overall community preparedness, planning, response, and recovery.  Emergency management office\agency audit and other related reports for U.S. States, Counties, territories, and other jurisdictions (counties, cities, etc.) will be added as a repository for our members to review as received.

The following is the recent completed audit report for the Commonwealth of Virginia, Audit of Selected Cycles for the Period July 1, 2016 Through June 30, 2018 internal controls and compliance related to federal grants management, specifically non-disaster related federal grants.  In addition financial management of Radiological Emergency Preparedness Funds were also reviewed.

Link (Auditor of Public Accounts.

During the current buildup from Hurricane\Storm Florence concerns for community preparedness, threats to nuclear facilities in the path of the storm, and the leadership of the Commonwealth of Virginia requested a pre-approved Presidential Disaster Declaration before the threat struck land were many of your concerns.

Please review this audit report if members of the Commonwealth of Virginia community.  As with all members in other jurisdictions keep in mind to review your local, State, county or other audit reports as posted and forward to BEMA International.

Sincerely,


Charles D. Sharp


Charles D. Sharp
Chief Executive Officer
Black Emergency Managers Association 
          International
1231  Good Hope Road  S.E.
Washington, D.C.  20020
Office:   202-618-9097 
bEMA International 

Saturday, September 8, 2018

NIH. NIMHD Loan Repayment Program. Application Period.


Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.
Updates

NIMHD Loan Repayment Program

The NIMHD Loan Repayment Program (LRP) is now open for applications and invites qualified health professionals with doctoral degrees to apply to its 2019 application cycle:
  • Loan Repayment Program for Health Disparities Research
  • Extramural Clinical Research Loan Repayment Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds
The LRP offers loan repayment awards of up to $35,000 of a recipient’s qualified educational debt annually, in return for a commitment to engage in NIMHD and NIH-mission relevant health disparities or clinical research in non-federal research settings for at least two years. 
The objectives of the congressionally established programs are to:
  1. Increase the pool of highly qualified researchers who conduct health disparities research
  2. Recruit and retain highly qualified health professionals from disadvantaged backgrounds into clinical research careers. 
Please apply early for this funding opportunity. Applications must be submitted by 8:00 PM EST on November 15, 2018.

Learn More


Tuesday, August 28, 2018

Access to Food. African Descent Communities in the U.S. Is this a global issue.



By JULIA TURSHEN
04.18.18
The Spelman College professor reveals what you find when you see supermarkets as more than just a place to buy some bread.

Like everything in food, grocery shopping gives us a lot to unpack (no pun intended). So when I heard that Epicurious was dedicating 30 days to talking about groceries, I immediately thought of Dr. Ashanté M. Reese. Dr. Reese is an Assistant Professor of Anthropology at Spelman College, a 2017 Southern Foodways Alliance Smith Symposium Fellow, and the author of a forthcoming book, Between a Corner Store and a Safeway: Race, Resilience, and our Failing Food System. She tweets prolifically about her work, which is lucky for those of us who don’t have a seat in her classroom. I jumped at the chance to talk to her about what grocery stores tell us about ourselves, the problems with the term ‘food desert,’ and why some people just really, really need to shop with a grocery list.

Grocery stores operate as a ‘third space’ in most communities, something you’ve talked about. Can you explain what that term means and also how grocery stores operate as third spaces?

People define and use the term differently, but when I use it, I’m referring to these spaces of contact—places where people are social, particularly (and potentially) across lines of difference in ways that they may not be in other primary spaces that we intentionally cultivate (like our homes, or social spaces like church). So when we grocery shop, even if we don’t talk to people, these spaces are important for being in contact with others and the potential of what this contact means. For example, when I lived in D.C., I would see the same cashier at one of the local stores. That point of contact eventually became something I looked forward to and the cashier became someone I developed a relationship with. When we think of grocery stores in this context, it forces us to think about the multiple functions of stores.

Owning a grocery store means holding power in a community. Who owns most grocery stores in America?

I think it’s important to note that grocery stores (and here, I’m mostly referring to supermarkets and not the independently owned grocery stores that were more common in the early 20th century) in the U.S. are multinational corporations, which means people who have a ton of capital are those leading these corporations. Of course there are different forms of power, but yes, supermarkets are significant in neighborhoods for not only their role in providing food but also in the economic role.

We have to stop pretending that our food system is not broken. It is broken.

Your tweet thread about two Kroger grocery stores in Memphis so expertly broke down the politics of grocery stores. You said that grocery stores can “tell you much more than where people are buying food.” 

What can grocery stores show us?

Supermarkets provide food for us, yes. But they also function in ways that reveal inequities, even if that is not their intent. When supermarkets are mapped across the U.S., what we see is that neighborhoods of color, particularly predominantly Black neighborhoods, regardless of income, have lower access than their white counterparts. 

When we see supermarkets within historical context, this makes sense. Post 1960s, supermarkets followed the flight to the suburbs, chasing profits and stability, which also meant following mostly white and middle class consumers. This wasn’t something people didn’t know. As early as 1967 Trade Commissioner Mary Gardiner Jones was publicly commenting on supermarkets’ role in creating (or addressing) racial inequities. So when I say they tell us more than where people buy food, I am saying that they tell us about neighborhoods, they tell us about how deeply entrenched inequities are in U.S. society, and they tell us about why we should deeply question our investment in food corporations if we’re committed to increasing access and sovereignty for all.

When grocery stores shut down, what impact does that have for everyone who lives in those places?

What I know qualitatively from my research is that for elders in D.C. who I interviewed and could remember changes in supermarkets/grocery stores, the loss of a neighborhood store meant they had to alter their food geographies—where they were shopping, when they were shopping, and in some cases, how they would get there. We can’t assume that a store close to you will be the store you will choose. But it does make a difference when you don’t even have that choice. It may change one’s relationship to time and shopping.

The decline of grocery stores is not a new story, right?

No, it isn’t. We can map the decline, at least in major cities, since at least the 1960s. We have seen some change and growth as supermarkets return to the city alongside white and middle class people returning to the city. But by and large, we’ve seen waves of change as stores have grown in size and consumers have been offered other options that do not require them to go to a physical store, such as shopping online, Instacart, and the like.

You've said that the term 'food desert' should die and we need to all be part of an intersectional approach to understand food access inequality. 

So the first of a two-part question: why is ‘food desert’ a broken term?

Well, first let me say that my critique of this term has evolved over time. I remember using it when I first started graduate school in 2009. I first started thinking about its problems when I was thinking about what a food desert actually is and how it functions. I felt that, just as we often only see barrenness in a desert and don’t consider the wildlife and critters that call it home and maintain that ecosystem, we ignore the people and institutions that exist in these neighborhoods that we call “deserts.” 

Secondly, and I have been deeply influenced by activists like LaDonna Redmond and more recently Dara Cooper, this term points to a static problem and totally ignores processes. There are no grocery stores here? 

That didn’t happen overnight. And actually, the roots of these processes—capitalism, racism, etc.—are no different from those from which other inequalities stem from. So if we’re interested in radically changing the food landscape, we can’t just focus on adding stores. We need to think about how supermarkets are intertwined with capital, neighborhood values, etc.

I will always fight for people’s right to have a choice.

Now part two: what does the intersectional approach to understanding food access inequality, and the intersectional approach to creating food access equity, look like?

I’ll try to keep this succinct, but it may be hard. First, I think we have to stop pretending that our food system is not broken. It is broken, and it isn’t just broken because of the threat of GMOs or people not knowing their farmers or where their food comes from. That is, indeed, part of it. But it is also broken because it has always reflected back to us the inequalities that exist in our society. To really reckon with that means that we have to consider how race, class, gender, sexuality, ability, etc. are not just individual experiences or identities. 

They are structures, often oppressive structures, that we cannot ignore. To treat them intersectionally is to consider how food is not separate from race, not separate from gender, not separate from ability, etc. and that where a person or community stands at these intersections means that they have radically different life chances and access to food.

A really important element of grocery shopping is having agency to choose whatever you want. There’s freedom in not only having access to food, but having access to a variety of food. Which brings me to your very helpful tweet thread about the proposed SNAP boxes. 

Why is the elimination of choice such a vital thing to pay attention to?’

Another big question! Everything about this country and our food policies suggest that we a) do not trust poor people, b) do not believe poor people know how to make good choices for themselves, and c) we have a disdain for poor people. I am using “we” here to signal that this is a nationwide problem, and we see it in our policies, we see it in much of our philanthropy, and I certainly see it in the assumptions that go into much of the food work that people are getting funding for. We say we believe in choice in this country, that it is a fundamental right—except when you’re poor and a so-called “burden” to the state. I have said this before: while I want people to be healthy, I will always fight for people’s right to have a choice to define that for themselves, live that out for themselves, and have access to everything they need to make that a reality for themselves, even if that doesn’t look like my own definition or life. If I am only willing to advocate because of how I think other people should live, that’s just another form of bondage.

If we’re interested in radically changing the food landscape, we can’t just focus on adding stores.

A lighter question for you: where and how often do you shop for groceries?

I have a housemate, and we share grocery shopping and cooking responsiblities. We typically do shopping on Sundays and we alternate between Kroger and the Dekalb Farmer’s Market, which is an international market which has everything I need, and things I don’t need. Sometimes my housemate shops at Trader Joe’s, and I also love Sprouts. We live on the westside of Atlanta, though, and neither of those stores are close to us. We also support local farmers from whom we buy produce and are considering a CSA with an urban farm close to us.

Do you write a grocery list or are you more of a wanderer?

I make a list based on what we have decided to cook for the week, but I am a terrible shopper. I end up getting more things than I ever plan for. Just yesterday, I went to the grocery store and after, I texted my housemate (who is a much better shopper than I am) and declared she should never allow me to do the shopping again.


RECOMMENDED READING LIST

Search This Blog

ARCHIVE List 2011 - Present