“The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.” -Alvin Toffler

Sunday, January 29, 2023

Farm Flood Management & Response. Webinar. February 1, 2023. 11am PT


Webinar Description

After weeks of heavy rainfall, growers have faced several challenges. 

This webinar brings together representatives from the Food and Drug Administration, USDA Farm Services Agency, University of California, Davis, and Industry to share information regarding the assessment of flooding impacts. In addition, the speakers will discuss factors growers should consider in their decision-making process relative to current and future plantings. 

This webinar is brought to you by the California Department of Food and Agriculture and Western Growers. Don’t miss this opportunity; join us and ask questions.

Webinar is open to all.

Please send media inquiries to Ann Donahue, adonahue@wga.com or CDFA Public Affairs Office, OfficeOfPublicAffairs@cdfa.ca.gov

Dismantling Implicit Bias: Awareness to Action workshop. On demand for 2023

 




==============

Black Emergency Managers Association International
Washington, D.C.  20020


 

bEMA International
Cooperation, Collaboration, Communication, Coordination, Community engagement, and  Partnering (C5&P)


A 501 (c) 3 organization

“You have to act as if it were possible to radically transform the world. And you have to do it all the time.” —Angela Davis

 

 

Saturday, January 28, 2023

Food Insecurity: Farm Workers. "Extreme weather creates a food crisis for California farmworkers" January 2023

California farmworkers who harvest the nation’s food are paid so little that they can’t always afford to eat. Now extreme weather events — many of them fueled by climate change — are making matters worse.

“For many California farmworkers, the storms have been devastating. Some were forced to evacuate, or lost cars and other possessions to the flooding. And throughout the state, workers have been unable to work, losing income to buy basic necessities." While official data is non-existent, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists, between 1.1 million and 1.9 million farmworkers and their family members are food insecure. Climate change in turn makes farm work more precarious than ever. All of which means less money to put food on the table.




On a brisk afternoon in mid-January, Eloy Ortiz is pacing the back alley behind a white house in Watsonville, California, in the heart of California’s strawberry industry. The house is under an evacuation warning after weeks of torrential rain, but that hasn’t stopped hundreds of women and children from crowding around the back gate. Some women are dragging grocery carts. Others are trying to entertain their very bored children. They have been waiting for hours for the bags of beans and maseca corn flour that volunteers are giving away.

“I’d say we have about 300 farmworker family members here,” says Ortiz, eyeing the crowd. He raises his voice so the women in the back can hear him. “Please!” he says in Spanish, “there are some cars that are trying to pass!” The crowd is blocking traffic.

Ortiz is a board member and volunteer with the Center for Farmworker Families, a nonprofit that assists farmworker communities throughout Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties on California’s Central Coast. The group has been distributing food for over a decade, but this is a big crowd, even by their standards. Many of the women in line pick strawberries for a living, and the crop has taken a beating from California’s winter storms. Farmers face up to $200 million in damages, according to the California Strawberry Commission.

Ortiz and the other volunteers have given each woman a number to keep the line, which stretches down the block, organized. A few women are worried the food will run out by the time their numbers are called.

 “I have number 299,” says one woman in Spanish. She knew there would be a long wait here and brought her own folding chair. “And if your number’s around 300, sometimes you don’t get anything.”

The woman is waiting with her friend, a woman in a damp pink sweater who got caught in the rain. They both ask to remain anonymous. Like many of the women here, they’ve worked in the Central Coast’s strawberry fields for decades and don’t want their employers to hear them talking frankly about their jobs.


“The floods are going to make this a hard year,” says the woman in the pink sweater. While this is the off season for many workers, those who do work through the winter are currently idle. A disaster like this needs to get cleaned up, which could delay the whole planting season. And last season was hard, too, because of California’s historic drought. “We are going to see so much need here this year,” she says.

California’s massive agricultural industry is still assessing the damage from a relentless series of atmospheric rivers earlier this month, which triggered mudslides, flooded communities and killed at least 20 people. For some farmers, the storms may well have been a lifeline, bringing much-needed rain to a state suffering from its worst drought in 1,200 years. For others, the breached levees and flooded fields have been a disaster.

For many California farmworkers, the storms have been devastating. Some were forced to evacuate, or lost cars and other possessions to the flooding. And throughout the state, workers have been unable to work, losing income to buy basic necessities.

According to workers and labor advocates throughout the state, the storms amplify an already troubling situation. The farmworkers who harvest the nation’s food are paid so little that they can’t always afford to eat. Now, extreme weather events—many of which are fueled by climate change—are making matters worse.

Farmworker food insecurity has been a problem for years. The federal government doesn’t keep data on this, but the Union of Concerned Scientists estimates that between 1.1 million and 1.9 million farmworkers and their family members don’t know where their next meal is coming from. Now, with wildfires, heatwaves, drought and floods taking a toll on California’s farmland, some farm laborers are working less, if at all. Farmworkers are paid hourly or piece rate, based on how many strawberries or grapes they pick, so when their work hours plummet, their income shrinks too. Even in good times, farmworkers in California only earned an average $12 an hour, according to a 2015-2019 federal survey.

“That creates all sorts of challenges for farmworker communities,” says Josue Medellin-Azuara, an associate professor of environmental engineering at the University of California, Merced. “When climate hits, these communities of farmworkers are hit harder.”

In a study published last November, Medellin-Azuara and his team found that California’s drought eliminated more than 12,000 farm jobs out of an estimated 450,000 agricultural workforce in 2022. The losses don’t account for farmworkers who retained their jobs but saw their hours cut. And there may be more job losses ahead. “The droughts are not going away,” he says.

Many California farmworkers are undocumented, which means they don’t qualify for unemployment or SNAP benefits. The state’s California Food Assistance Program (CFAP) provides food assistance for many immigrants who are excluded from federal food assistance, and last year, the state legislature took steps to extend the program to undocumented residents over the age of 55. But the age cutoff will exclude many undocumented people from those benefits. 

Medellin-Azuara suggests that California extend safety net programs like unemployment insurance to farmworkers, regardless of their immigration status. “[These are] people who belong to the lowest income groups in the state, that are vulnerable,” he says.

Back at the Center for Farmworker Families’ food distribution event, Eloy Ortiz is handing out rolls of toilet paper. His initial headcount has turned out to be low: there are 450 families here, not 300. Volunteers are giving each woman in line a bag of beans or maseca, rather than a bag of each, since there might not be enough food to go around.

Ortiz agrees that the state should expand unemployment and other benefits to undocumented workers. He also thinks that farm companies that operate in California need to pay their workers a living wage. “People are living in poverty in one of the most economically prosperous areas of the country,” he says.

Agriculture is a $50 billion industry in the state, but a federal survey found that nearly a quarter of the state’s farmworkers live below the federal poverty line. That makes them more vulnerable economically when disasters like drought and the recent rains hit. And that, says Ortiz, is the root of the problem.


 An audio version of this article originally aired with Here & NowAudio Version

It may not be reproduced without express permission from FERN. 

If you are interested in republishing or reposting this article, please contact info@thefern.org

 

Washington, D.C.


 

bEMA International

Cooperation, Collaboration, Communication, Coordination, Community engagement, and  Partnering (C5&P)

 

A 501 (c) 3 organization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Food Insecurity: Bioengineered Foods. What exactly are Bioengineered / Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s) and are they Unhealthy?

Check your supermarket product ingredients.  

More and more products will start to contain 'bioengineered ingredients'.  

---------   

What exactly are Bioengineered/Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) and are they Unhealthy?

Bioengineered foods are those that have been genetically modified in a laboratory. This means that the genes of one organism have been inserted into another organism, in order to change its characteristics. For example, Monsanto has developed a type of corn that is resistant to the herbicide Roundup. This means that farmers can spray Roundup on their fields to kill the weeds, without harming the corn. While bioengineered foods may offer some benefits to farmers and consumers, they also pose several risks.

What are GMO’s

The term ‘GMO’ is vague and can mean many different things, depending on what you read. It could refer to bioengineering, genetic engineering, or just the ingredients of genetically engineered foods.

Bioengineered foods are scientifically altered organisms that have had their DNA changed using biotechnology such as gene guns, bacteria or foreign genes.
Genetic engineering is different from traditional breeding practices since it allows DNA from one species to be introduced into another unrelated species. In traditional breeding practices, a plant breeder may choose to cross two varieties of the same species because each has particular desirable traits. For example, to increase the hardiness of tomatoes, a plant breeder might cross a hardy variety with one that produces particularly tasty fruit.
There is a huge difference between genetically engineered crops and those that are traditionally bred. Crossbreeding crops has been happening for thousands of years, but genetic engineering inserts new genes into completely unrelated species.
For example, let’s say there is a soybean plant that has been genetically engineered to tolerate herbicides. Because this GE soybean plant contains DNA from an unrelated species (another plant), the resulting soybean fruit might have all kinds of unpredictable and dangerous interactions with other genes within that organism, as well as with other plants, animals and humans.
Bioengineered Foods are Potentially Unhealthy.
Bioengineering is the process of changing an organism’s DNA. This often results in foods that have been changed in an unnatural way and are not good for our health. These bioengineered food products can introduce novel organisms into our bodies that can cause harm.
Genetic engineering can introduce a novel protein into a fruit or vegetable that could trigger an allergic reaction in those who are sensitive to that particular protein.
For example, the FDA approved genetically engineered salmon for human consumption despite reports from their own scientists that this fish’s flesh was “significantly less firm” and contained more of the allergenic protein, IGF-1, than wild salmon.
Unfortunately, the FDA’s approval of genetically engineered salmon was based on a study conducted by AquaBounty, the biotechnology company that created this novel breed of fish.
The FDA did not require an independent study to prove the safety and healthiness of this GE product prior to approving its public use. The FDA’s own scientists even warned that the AquaBounty salmon might cause increased risks for certain types of cancer, prompting them to call for further long-term studies.
The FDA approved this GE fish in 2015 but has yet to require any additional testing—so it is currently not labeled as genetically engineered in the marketplace.
In fact, the FDA conducted no human clinical trials on GMO foods before allowing them onto your dinner plate! Likewise in Canada, there is no requirement for mandatory human clinical trials before allowing novel food products into the marketplace.
Why were Bioengineered Foods Created?
In the US, GMO vegetables are typically engineered for resistance to herbicides or increased tolerance to herbicides. In most cases, GM plants have been engineered to be resistant to glyphosate-containing herbicides, such as Roundup. This allows farmers using these genetically modified seeds to kill weeds without killing the genetically modified corn or soybeans. Unfortunately, this results in a dramatic increase in the use of glyphosate-based herbicides.
GMOs were created in the first place because big chemical companies like Monsanto saw an opportunity to make billions of dollars in profits by selling patented GM seeds to farmers. And they continue to be developed primarily for this reason—to make money, not to improve our health.
Are Foods Sprayed with Glyphosate Harmful?
Some people say that the glyphosate used in industry is minimally toxic to humans. But others, including some scientists within the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are concerned that glyphosate may be contributing to a number of serious health problems, such as cancer, birth defects and gluten intolerance.
Glyphosate-based herbicides like Roundup were originally created to kill plants. They are designed to inhibit an enzyme called EPSP synthase, which is necessary for plants to grow. Monsanto, the creator of Roundup, claims that glyphosate does not pose a risk to human health because humans do not have the EPSP synthase enzyme. But many scientists now believe that glyphosate may be harmful to humans because it inhibits more than just the EPSP synthase enzyme.
Glyphosate has also been shown to kill beneficial gut bacteria and change the expression of genes in human cells.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), an autonomous arm of the World Health Organization (WHO), recently classified glyphosate as a “probable human carcinogen” based on evidence from animal studies that showed it can cause cancer.
Other Concerns with Bioengineered Foods?
The creation of new diseases is one of the biggest concerns about genetic engineering. New diseases arise every year, and the way they spread is unpredictable. With bioengineered foods, scientists can’t accurately predict where new diseases will arise because they don’t fully understand what will happen when DNA from radically different species are combined. What’s really disturbing is how little research has been done on this topic or on the possible adverse effects to human health.
While new diseases and viruses are one problem, old diseases may also become more prevalent because of genetic engineering. For example, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease, can be transmitted to humans through beef consumption, and it’s caused by prions, which are rogue proteins. The first cases of BSE in cows appeared after scientists inserted the gene coding for a protein (a prion) from another species into cows’ DNA to make their milk more nutritious.
What’s the Long-Term Problem?
The long-term effects of bioengineered foods are not yet known. For instance, no human feeding studies exist for any of the bioengineered foods on the market today.
But studies from the biotech industry have shown that after consuming bioengineered soybeans for only three generations, hamsters had dramatically reduced sperm production and abnormal embryos. The insulin-producing cells in the pancreas of mice that were given genetically engineered potatoes completely shut down after only 10 days. Other studies from the biotech industry have shown that the intestines of animals that were fed bioengineered corn were unable to absorb nutrients and that the livers of rats fed bioengineered canola oil became fatty and diseased.
According to Jeffrey Smith the author of Seeds of Deception, genetic engineering can damage or rearrange genes, resulting in changes to a food’s nutritional content, creation of new toxins, or cause unexpected allergenic effects.
Genetic engineering also threatens many non-food plants that support our ecosystems, like wildflowers. For example, Monsanto’s bioengineered “Roundup Ready” canola — designed to resist the herbicide Roundup — has escaped into the environment and is thriving across North America. This is erasing populations of wild canola, which are vital to the life support system that sustains many species in our ecosystem like bees, butterflies, moths, birds, and more.
What are the Alternatives to Bioengineered Foods?
There are many ways of creating new varieties of plants that don’t involve genetic engineering. All it takes is crossbreeding plants with desirable traits over several generations through extensive field trials. This process doesn’t create new diseases or viruses and it doesn’t involve the use of foreign DNA. It also allows us to test new varieties in real-world conditions before they become available to farmers and gardeners, which helps ensure the healthiest product with minimal environmental impact.
How do You Avoid Eating GMO Foods?
The European Union, Japan and Australia all require foods containing GMO’s to be labeled as such. In the U.S., however, it’s nearly impossible to tell if your food has been genetically modified unless you buy organic. Likewise in Canada, there are no mandatory labels for genetically modified produce.
It’s difficult to avoid bioengineered foods because they’re in most processed foods such as cookies, crackers, sauces, soups and salad dressings.
The most common GMO foods for human consumption in Canada are soybeans, including soybean oil, corn and canola. Other significant crops that are genetically modified include: sugar beets, zucchini, yellow summer squash, plum tomatoes, papaya from Hawaii, as well as some varieties of potatoes.
The easiest way to avoid eating GMO foods is to buy organic. 
Foods that are certified organic by a third-party organization like EcoCert, or Quality Assurance International (QAI) cannot contain GMOs. You can also look for a Non-GMO Project label. Keep informed and up to date by joining COTA, Canadian Organic Trade Association. COTA leads the organic industry and government on a wide range of issues affecting the organic sector.
In summary, genetically engineered foods are unhealthy because they introduce new diseases and may cause old diseases to become more common. They also threaten our ecosystems, like bees, butterflies, moths, birds, and more.
Genetic engineering is fraught with uncertainty since its risks are new and unstudied. That’s why more independent scientific research must be conducted to better understand the impact of bioengineering on all aspects of our environment, including soil health and seed viability.
The best way to avoid eating GMO’s is to support organic farming by buying only organic products when possible and to stay informed.

Popular Posts

ARCHIVE List 2011 - Present

Search This Blog