Tuesday, February 12, 2019

RACE AND HEALTH. The New Food Movement Has a Problem with Race. From: MUNCHIES in May, 2015.


RACE AND HEALTH.   The New Food Movement Has a Problem with Race
By Lauren Rothman
Sep 13 2015, 11:00am


The New Food Movement Has a Problem with Race
Natasha Bowens—farmer, activist, and author of The Color of Food —sees something missing in our new local, farm-to-table food culture: people of color.

When you think about the rapidly growing food movement, what comes to mind? Backyard chicken enthusiasts in Portland? Farm-to-table chefs plucking tender bunches of chervil from their Berkeley restaurant gardens? Or maybe you consider a farmer out in the Midwest, plunging her hands into the soil to harvest the potatoes growing there.

In your mind's eye, what color are those hands? If they're white (albeit streaked with soil), then your thought process is likely a reflection of how agriculture—and to a larger extent—our entire food system, tends to be portrayed: as a field that's almost totally lacking in diversity, one that consistently pushes the country's countless African-American, Latino, and Asian farmers, chefs, and entrepreneurs to the margins.

That's the thesis, at least, laid out by Natasha Bowens, a farmer and food justice advocate based outside Washington, D.C. A former grassroots organizer whose work focused on environmental issues, health care, and social justice, Bowens eventually made food systems central to her work and settled in western Maryland, where she began to grow her own food. As she crossed paths with more and more farmers and activists, Bowens says, she realized that a huge demographic was absent from the conversation: people of color.

"From seed to table, the corporate-controlled food industry in this country is rife with discrimination, oppression, and the denial of rights," she writes on her website, The Color of Food. "Rights to healthy food, rights to land, rights to a clean environment, and rights to an equal opportunity for success and livelihood for farmers are not fairly attainable."

In response to the color-washing she repeatedly saw in her chosen field, Bowens developed a multimedia project in 2010—the centerpiece of which is her new book The Color of Food—that seeks to show the food movement in all its diversity. Traveling around the country and meeting with groups such as the Black Farmers and Agriculturists Association and the Traditional Native American Farmers Association, Bowens located the farmers that she features—in full-page, color portraits with accompanying essays—in her new book. MUNCHIES spoke with Bowens about the misrepresentation of the food movement.

MUNCHIES: Hi, Natasha. So how did this become your life's work? Natasha Bowens: I was organizing in communities, I was organizing on college campuses, I was courting student organizations, and just really getting a broad perspective of all of these issues that folks around the country were concerned with. I just felt like there was one issue in particular that was tied with our health, social justice issues, and the environment, and that was food.

I started immersing myself in the food movement, working in urban farms and community gardens. I started working at the local farmers' market. I started growing my own food, attending conferences, reading tons of books. And it was then when I was really immersing myself in the agriculture movement that I started to really notice the inequities. I realized that it was such an exclusive movement: this whole foods, organic, fresh food, local food thing. And I thought, Where are the people of color being represented?

I started to connect the dots of the inequities in what people call the food justice movement as far as having access to fresh food, and the high rates of diabetes and other illnesses that impact communities of color at such higher rates. I started to see that these inequities in the representation of the food movement were really rooted in inequities and discrimination within the system. And yet in all of the books, at all of the conferences that I was attending, people of color weren't being represented. Their voices weren't being heard, even though they were being impacted the most by the broken food system.

On a very personal level, I started to feel a little bit out of place as a woman of color, farming, when the typical image of a farmer is a white man. I really wanted to find solidarity, and to claim that we belong here, too. That was the impetus for getting on the road with The Color of Food.

Can you expand a little bit on how you think the food movement is currently portrayed? The few times that people of color are represented when we're talking about food or agriculture, it's about farm workers, migrant labor, food access, food insecurity—showing communities of color lined up at the farmers market with their food stamps. I felt like it was really doing us an injustice because our food narrative is so much richer than that.

While raising awareness about issues of inequities and injustice, I also wanted to celebrate and honor farmers that are out there, right alongside the mainstream exclusive farmer, and there are communities all over the country: Native American communities, Asian communities, Hispanic, black communities that are out there farming, and that have been farming. I interviewed so many farmers that have been on their land for hundreds of years, who have growing organically well before the word existed. Their farms have been passed down within their families, just like our typical American family farm. One farmer, Mr. Gary Grant in Tillery, North Carolina, said, "We're family farmers, too—why aren't we called family farmers? We're black farmers. That's our label. But we're family farmers, too."

You say that your work is political in nature. Being a person of color, farming and having sovereignty over my food and where it comes from is a political act. A revolutionary act—being out here farming, serving the land in a way that's environmentally friendly, running our own businesses, having our own independence, having sovereignty over our own seeds, over our foods.

You say that our food system is broken. How so? Farmers are losing their land and getting put out of business because of corporations that are patenting seeds. And then we have new farmers that can't attain land, and we have existing and veteran farmers that are losing their land because of discrimination, and because of barriers in the USDA system. We have injustice with folks who are harvesting food—farm workers as well as farmers are not getting paid a fair, living wage. And then we have things being sprayed on our food, food being distributed being unfairly, unjustly: We have great, healthy food going to high-income communities, and not to communities of color. From seed to table, we have so many issues with our system. It's beyond broken. I think if you dig deep enough, you can find the injustice. You don't even need to dig that deep.

With your book, you're hoping to show that our food system is much more diverse than is commonly acknowledged. How else do you think some of these injustices can be corrected? I think the first step is to start having these really tough conversations. There are intentional gatherings that are happening all around the country, called "Dismantling Racism in the Food System," and that's where a lot of food movement activists and farmers are gathering. It really helps everyone to get in the room and start putting together plans for how to address these issues on a system-wide level.

And we need to start putting folks in positions of power. There's a farmer that I interviewed, Renard Turner, from Virginia. He was complaining about just how long it's taken to gain leadership as a black farmer in the state of Virginia, and now, this year, he was just elected the president of the Virginia Biological Farming Association. Examples like that are steps in the right direction.

What do you hope readers will gain from the book? There's a lot that I hope that comes out of this book, and it's going to depend on the person. Someone who maybe wasn't aware of farmers of color, or of what farmers of color contribute to agriculture—I would love them to pick it up and kind of have the light go on for them. I'd love to have a young person of color who might be thinking about farming, or might be thinking about joining the food movement in some regard, to pick up the book and really feel like, Oh, this is a place for me. I haven't seen my face here, I haven't felt like this is a space for me, and now I know it is. And I hope that other farmers of color that are out there looking for solidarity and looking for power in numbers can find it here, because often it's really hard to step up and step forward when you have so many hoops to jump over, just to stand next to the white male farmer. I hope the book really pushes all of these conversations in forward.

Thanks for speaking to me, Natasha.

This post previously appeared on MUNCHIES in May, 2015.

National Latino Farmers & Ranchers Trade Association 
1029 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 601
Washington, DC 20005
Office: (202) 628-8833
Fax No.: (202) 393-1816
Twitter: @NLFRTA
Website: www.NLFRTA.org 

DisasterReady. Preventing Corruption in Humanitarian Aid February 2019

Preventing Corruption in Humanitarian Aid

Humanitarian Essentials



Corruption, the abuse of entrusted power for private gain, disproportionately affects the world’s most vulnerable people. Even with their noble intentions, humanitarian organizations responding to a crisis are not immune from corruption.

This course will help you recognize potential signs of corruption and apply appropriate measures to minimize it. Learn how to reduce the risk of corruption in your organization and contribute to a more transparent and accountable environment.



Thursday, February 7, 2019

Voting Holiday. 1st Tuesday in November enacted before 2020.

VOTING HOLIDAY.
1st Tuesday of November.
A federal holiday that focuses on the values and nature of our 'great experiment' government. Voting rights for all.

Stay focused.

A voting holiday enacted before the 2020 elections. PERIOD.


BEMA International

Friday, February 1, 2019

Effective Advocating & Lobbying Your Elected Officials. Webinar: 2/14/2019

  • February 14, 1 - 2 PM ET: Effective Advocating & Lobbying Your Elected Officials: In this training, we will educate and prepare business leaders to be effective advocates for your issues. Here's what you will learn:
    • Plan an in-person meeting with policy makers
    • How to prepare and research for in-person meeting
    • Execute a successful meeting with policy makers
    • Post-meeting outreach
    • Get your message to policy makers when you can't meet in person (outside-in approach)
Register Here:
     https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_5S6HeDgoTpuvqD0YdvKJVA

=============================

·      February 21, 1 - 2 PM ET: Hone Your Message and Work with the Media to Get It Out: If the new political reality has you itching to speak out in the media, this session is for you. Learn best practices from the front lines. Here's what you will learn:
o  How to make the strongest arguments for your policy agenda
o  How to use your company as proof for how policies affect business
o  How to locate journalists interested in what you have to say
o  Tips to enhance your credibility and confidence

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Specialist Opportunity. January 30, 2019

Anything similar in your jurisdiction?

BEMA International




Greetings,

Serve DC seeks a Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Specialist to help create a Safer, Stronger DC. Apply by clicking the button below or share with your network.

Yours in service,
DC CERT


Tuesday, January 29, 2019

Chairman Thompson to Secretary Nielsen: Your Refusal to Testify on Border Security Is Unacceptable. January 2019



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Chairman Thompson to Secretary Nielsen: Your Refusal to Testify on Border Security Is Unacceptable

The Secretary outrageously attempts to use the President’s shutdown as an excuse not to come before Congress
January 29, 2019 (WASHINGTON) – Today, Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS), Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security, sent the below letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, calling on her to reconsider her refusal to testify before the Committee next week:


Dear Secretary Nielsen:

Your decision to refuse my invitation to testify before the Committee on Homeland Security regarding our Nation’s border security on February 6, 2019, is unreasonable and unacceptable.  I strongly urge you to reconsider.

Your attempt to use the President’s recent shutdown as an excuse not to testify before Congress prior to the impending shutdown is outrageous.  As Secretary of Homeland Security, you should be prepared to testify on border security, the very issue that caused the recent shutdown, at any time and certainly prior to the potential February 15 lapse in appropriations. 

During the shutdown, you made numerous public appearances and comments regarding border security.  You should be well prepared to inform the public about the Department of Homeland Security’s border security needs as well as provide Congress with accurate information that can inform any pending border security legislation. 

The recent Federal government shutdown jeopardized homeland security, cost our economy $11 billion, and caused incalculable harm to the country. The Nation is just days away from President Trump again shutting down the government.  Your failure to engage Congress only makes averting another shutdown more difficult.

The men and women of the Department of Homeland Security continue to carry out their duties admirably despite difficult and uncertain circumstances.  I am hopeful you will follow their lead and agree to testify before the Committee on Homeland Security on February 6.  In your public comments on border security, you maintained that Congress should “get [its] job done.”  Please know that as Chairman, I intend to ensure the Committee fulfills its oversight responsibilities on this important matter.

Sincerely,
BENNIE G. THOMPSON
Chairman


#  #  #
Media contact: Adam Comis at (202) 225-9978



Federal Shutdown Budget Approval Options for the future January 2019

Federal Shutdown Budget Approval Options.
Inclusion & Diversity across the board.
Was the military industrial contractors affected by the 2018-2019 federal shutdown?
Options for shutdown for consideration:
1. All non 'TS' (top secret) related contractor programs under DOD shift to GSA that will be affected by any future federal shutdowns if DOD budget was approved before other federal agencies and programs;
2. 10-day limit on federal shutdowns,
3. during 10-day limit concessions and approvals by Legislative and Executive branches of government,
4. agreement MUST be reached during this only 10-day limit for concessions, agreements, and approvals, if not
5. previous yeas approved budget immediately approved and implemented for COOP with built in cost of inflation for next budget period.
END OF BUDGET APPROVAL PROCESS UNTIL NEXT PERIOD.
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist."
Dwight D. Eisenhower.

RECOMMENDED READING LIST

Search This Blog

ARCHIVE List 2011 - Present