“The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.” -Alvin Toffler

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

COVID-19 Case Projection Model for the NCR (June 3, 2020)

The June 3, 2020 7-Day Projections and Long-Term Projections for NCR COVID-19 Cases; and Medical Demand Projections for Hospitalized, ICU, and Ventilator Cases are shown below. 

The Long-Term Projections go out to 21 days. Please understand that with the longer projections, the level of uncertainty also increases.

Individual county-level projection graphs are available in the attachment.

=========================================

IEM’s AI Modeling:  Short-term COVID-19 Projections For MWCOG
NEW:  Long-range COVID-19 Projections


Leveraging over 15 years of support to HHS for medical consequence modeling and our proprietary artificial intelligence (AI) models, IEM believes that our Coronavirus model outputs can be used to assist localities and their medical facilities to better prepare for an increase in hospitalizations, to better plan for and locate drive-through testing facilities, and to determine where increased levels of transmission may be occurring.  

We have been refining our AI model over the past month and are confident in its ability to provide accurate 7-Day projections of confirmed cases that can be used for operational and logistical planning.  Additionally, we also provide projections for medical demand – hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) care, and mechanical ventilation.  New long-range projections have been developed to provide projections for up to 3 weeks.  These long-range projections naturally have higher uncertainty than the short-term (7-day) projections.

AI-based Model Background

IEM is currently using an AI model to fit data from various sources and project new cases of COVID-19.  We do not assume the average number of secondary infections (R-value) stays the same over time.  IEM’s AI model finds the best R-value over time to evaluate how it changes over the course of the outbreak.  The IEM modeling team is running ~11 million simulations to fit each jurisdiction’s data for actual confirmed cases and using the best fit for the R-value to project new cases over the next 7 days. Any changes in the R-value are purely based on the confirmed case data and are not attributable to specific factors such as social distancing (although social distancing is a major factor).  The AI models are executed on a daily basis to evaluate the changing dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our projections have typically been within 20%, and are often within 10%, of actual confirmed cases.

The projections shown in this document are based on data pulled in as of 6/3/20 11 a.m.

Please provide any feedback or send any questions that you might have to us.  We are continually updating and improving the model, so your feedback is critical.  

Also, if you have more current or refined data for your jurisdiction that you would like IEM to factor in, please let us know.




IEM’s Modeling Lead

Dr. Prasith “Sid” Baccam is a Computational Epidemiologist expert at IEM with more than 20 years of experience in medical consequence modeling and simulation of disease outbreaks and medical consequences following hypothetical attacks with biological agents or emerging infectious diseases. He develops key simulation models and decision support tools at IEM, specializing in public health, disaster response, and medical countermeasures (MCM) to enhance data-driven decision making and improve modeling assumptions.

Upon receiving his Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics and Immunobiology at Iowa State University, Dr. Baccam worked as a Postdoctoral Research Associate at Los Alamos National Laboratory where he focused on researching viral and immunological modeling. He has worked with state and local public health officials as well as Federal agencies, including HHS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Dr. Baccam has published numerous papers on public health response models and implications on policy and has been invited to participate in workshops and symposiums held by the Institute of Medicine (now the National Academy of Health). His modeling results have been briefed to the Executive Office of the President and informed two presidential policy actions.    
            Actual Confirmed Cases: 6/2/20                 Projected Confirmed Cases: 6/9/20

 
         

Actual Confirmed Cases On:


Projected Cases For:




5/31
6/1
6/2
6/3
6/4
6/5
6/6
6/7
6/8
6/9
6/16
6/23
Washington DC
8,801
8,886
9,016
9,101
9,183
9,263
9,341
9,416
9,488
9,559
9,998
10,355
Charles  Co., MD
1,120
1,133
1,152
1,167
1,182
1,197
1,212
1,227
1,241
1,256
1,357
1,454
Frederick  Co., MD
1,939
1,961
2,013
2,042
2,071
2,101
2,131
2,162
2,193
2,225
2,464
2,733
Montgomery  Co., MD
11,476
11,731
11,924
12,138
12,350
12,562
12,773
12,982
13,192
13,400
14,836
16,236
Prince George's  Co., MD
15,808
15,968
16,116
16,339
16,558
16,772
16,983
17,190
17,394
17,593
18,898
20,052
Arlington  Co., VA
2,123
2,133
2,142
2,160
2,177
2,193
2,209
2,224
2,239
2,254
2,344
2,416
Fairfax  Co., VA
11,341
11,548
11,718
11,935
12,150
12,362
12,573
12,782
12,989
13,195
14,590
15,911
Loudoun  Co., VA
2,611
2,636
2,659
2,719
2,779
2,841
2,905
2,969
3,035
3,102
3,612
4,197
Prince William  Co., VA
7,085
7,186
7,323
7,494
7,665
7,838
8,011
8,185
8,360
8,536
9,795
11,101
Alexandria, VA
1,981
2,000
2,016
2,039
2,061
2,083
2,104
2,124
2,144
2,163
2,283
2,382
NCR
64,285
65,182
66,079
67,134
68,176
69,212
70,242
71,261
72,275
73,283
80,177
86,837
     
Projection Graphs:
 

Maryland County Projection Graphs:

             
Maryland County Projection Graphs:
 



Virginia County Projection Graphs:


 

Virginia County Projection Graphs:
 

Virginia City Projection Graphs:
              



Some recipients of our daily COVID-19 short-term (7 day) projections have requested projections of demand for: hospital bed, intensive care unit (ICU) beds, and mechanical ventilation. We realize that different states and localities will have different characteristics for hospital demand of COVID-19 cases, and we are presenting the best assumptions we could find for those medical demands based on scientific literature and health data reporting. Specifically:
        Beds: For hospitalization, we use a range of 10% and 20% of cases require hospitalization based on CDC’s report (MMWR, March 18, 2020) and state reports of COVID-19 cases.  
        ICU: The CDC report found that 24% of hospitalized cases require ICU care.  
        Ventilators: Based on clinical data from China and state reports, we assume that 50% of ICU cases require a ventilator.  
 
If you have other estimates for these assumptions, please share them with us as we work to refine our modeling, assumptions, and data on a daily basis.

The medical demands shown in the table assume 20% of cumulative confirmed cases require hospitalization. To get the medical demand for the assumption that 10% of confirmed cases require hospitalization, simply divide the demand by 2.  If you have your own jurisdiction-specific percentages, those can be applied to the projected cases to derive your own medical demands.  Likewise, you can apply your own jurisdiction’s demographics information to the projected cases to estimate impacts on subpopulations within your community (such as people over the age of 65 years).

Medical Demand Projections:

Actual Confirmed Cases On:
Projected Cases   (Hospitalized)   [ICU]   {Ventilator}  For:

    5/31         6/1
6/2
6/9
6/16
6/23
Washington DC
8,801           8,886
9,016
9,559   (1,912)   [459]   {229}
9,998   (2,000)   [480]   {240}
10,355   (2,071)   [497]   {249}
Charles  Co., MD
1,120           1,133
1,152
1,256   (251)   [60]   {30}
1,357   (271)   [65]   {33}
1,454   (291)   [70]   {35}
Frederick  Co., MD
1,939           1,961
2,013
2,225   (445)   [107]   {53}
2,464   (493)   [118]   {59}
2,733   (547)   [131]   {66}
Montgomery  Co., MD
11,476        11,731
11,924
13,400   (2,680)   [643]   {322}
14,836   (2,967)   [712]   {356}
16,236   (3,247)   [779]   {390}
Prince George's  Co., MD
15,808        15,968
16,116
17,593   (3,519)   [844]   {422}
18,898   (3,780)   [907]   {454}
20,052   (4,010)   [962]   {481}
Arlington  Co., VA
2,123           2,133
2,142
2,254   (451)   [108]   {54}
2,344   (469)   [112]   {56}
2,416   (483)   [116]   {58}
Fairfax  Co., VA
11,341        11,548
11,718
13,195   (2,639)   [633]   {317}
14,590   (2,918)   [700]   {350}
15,911   (3,182)   [764]   {382}
Loudoun  Co., VA
2,611           2,636
2,659
3,102   (620)   [149]   {74}
3,612   (722)   [173]   {87}
4,197   (839)   [201]   {101}
Prince William  Co., VA
7,085           7,186
7,323
8,536   (1,707)   [410]   {205}
9,795   (1,959)   [470]   {235}
11,101   (2,220)   [533]   {266}
Alexandria, VA
1,981           2,000
2,016
2,163   (433)   [104]   {52}
2,283   (457)   [110]   {55}
2,382   (476)   [114]   {57}
NCR
64,285        65,182
66,079
73,283   (14,657)   [3,518]   {1,759}
80,177   (16,035)   [3,848]   {1,924}
86,837   (17,367)   [4,168]   {2,084}



For additional information from IEM, please contact Bryan Koon, Vice President of Emergency Management and Homeland Security at bryan.koon@iem.com or 850-519-7966 or Stephanie Tennyson at stephanie.tennyson@iem.com or 202-309-4257. 



June is Men's Health Month. June 2020


Men's Health Month. Image shows a young Black father and his young son.

June is Men's Health Month

The HHS Office of Minority Health (OMH) recognizes June as Men's Health Month, a national observance used to raise
awareness about health care for men and focus on encouraging boys, men and their families to practice and implement healthy living decisions. We invite you to join us in promoting messages like OMH's Five Plays for Men’s Health that remind men and boys that they can improve their health by seeking medical advice and taking other important steps, such as making healthy food choices, staying active, quitting smoking, getting regular checkups and taking care of their mental health.

Learn More


June 2020. Funding Opportunities.


Funding

Emergency Response Innovation Challenges

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) funds the development of health technology tools to support the needs of the general public and the health care system affected by large-scale health crises. 
Deadline is June 12.

General Public Health Care System


National Indian Health Outreach and Education

The HHS Indian Health Service (IHS) supports outreach and education efforts on mental health, domestic violence, HIV/AIDS, diabetes and health care access for American Indians/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs).
Deadline is June 29.

Learn More


Children's Hospitals Graduate Medical Education Payment Program

The HHS Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) provides graduate medical education funding for freestanding children's teaching hospitals. 
Deadline is July 24

Learn More

Run for Good Grant

The Saucony Run for Good Foundation supports nonprofit running programs for children 18 years or younger.
Deadline is June 15.

Learn More


Firearm Injury Surveillance Through Emergency Rooms

The HHS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) support state and local governments' reporting of emergency department visits for nonfatal firearm injuries and the dissemination of surveillance findings to stakeholders working to prevent or respond to firearm injuries.
Deadline is July 8

Learn More


Engaging Men in HIV Testing, Prevention, and Care

The HHS National Institutes of Health (NIH) support strategies to increase the engagement of men in HIV prevention and care among populations with lower rates of engagement and retention in HIV prevention and care.
Deadline is September 7.

Learn More


June 25, 2020. Supporting the Resilience of Black Men: Culturally Affirming and Responsive Approaches to Engagement, Treatment, and Recovery

Having trouble viewing this email? View it in your browser.




Systems Failure: LE. Re-Design the System Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center. June 2020.

A Message on the Killing of George Floyd



Photo credit: munshots/Unsplash.com

As the director of The Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center, I share our country’s horror at the killing of George Floyd. A killing made particularly disturbing by the fact that it came at the hands of someone who was vested with the power and responsibility to enforce laws and protect and serve the community.

The CSG Justice Center’s tagline is “advancing safety and second chances.” Safety means not just the absence of crime, but also the positive presence of government institutions that people can trust have their best interests at heart. Everyone is entitled to safety and deserves to be served by a government that not only minimizes harm but maximizes well-being. And until we can truly say that every Black person in America can trust in the criminal justice system to treat them fairly and with dignity and respect, our goals to advance safety and second chances for all cannot be achieved.

To that end, the CSG Justice Center is committed to using our energy and influence to oppose racism and racial bias and support our nation’s justice systems to live up to their highest ideals. We also recognize that this is a time to reflect on our own work and priorities. As are so many others, we are asking ourselves if we have done enough to advance racial equity through our work. The answer is assuredly no—we can, must, and will do more.
 

  FROM OUR PARTNERS  

A Series on Racism as a Determinant of Health and Equity



Image credit: Jess Rodrigues/Shutterstock.com
The American Public Health Association is hosting a four-part webinar series that will examine the systems, policies, and practices designed to limit and shape opportunities for people of color, and actions that can advance racial equity and justice.

The first in the series will take place on Tuesday, June 9, from 2–3:30 p.m. ET.
 


June 2020. Red Flags in Drug Research COVID-19..

GHN News



Twitter

Red Flags Raised on Research

2 top medical journals are reviewing major studies they published on potential COVID-19 treatments (including hydroxychloroquine) after questions about their data surfaced yesterday, Science reports.

The papers in The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine shared a common source: A little-known company called Surgisphere.

A Lancet "expression of concern" acknowledges that “important scientific questions have been raised about data” in a May 22 study that cast doubt on the benefits of hydroxycholoroquine for COVID-19 patients—and suggested it could even be deadly. The news put the brakes on large randomized trials drug trials. The Lancet announced that an independent audit of the data is underway.

Nicholas White, a malaria researcher at Mahidol University in Bangkok, is one of the researchers who noticed red flags including details about patient demographics that didn’t add up. “It began to stretch and stretch and stretch credulity,” he says.

Another paper, published in the New England Journal of Medicine on May 1, indicated that certain blood pressure drugs did not appear to increase the death risk for COVID-19 patients—also relied on Surgisphere data. The NEJM also issued an EOC indicating that they are seeking evidence of the data’s reliability from the study authors.

Surgisphere has not publicly released the data underlying the studies, but is in discussions to provide the study authors with additional details.

Popular Posts

ARCHIVE List 2011 - Present

Search This Blog